From Small Molecules to Large Biologics: a look at the impact of relative size and complexity and how it impacts the biosimilar debate in the states.
Category Archives: Advocacy and Regulations
Arizona’s Biosimilar Bill Goes to Committee This Week
A letter to our Arizona Legislators on Arizona’s Biosimilars BillContinue reading
BioCentury This Week: On The Brink of Disunioun
When President Obama delivers the State of the Union address on Tuesday, he’ll be speaking to a polarized Congress where brinksmanship is the order of the day. If lawmakers don’t act by March 1, budget sequestration will slash funding for biomedical research and oversight of the nation’s food and drug products. Continue reading
Medical Technology Manufacturers Make First Semimonthly $97 Million Medical Device Tax Payment
MITA, AdvaMed and MDMA Urge Congress to Repeal Job-Killing Device TaxContinue reading
A bit of certainty for biotech investors and innovators added to “The Fiscal Cliff Bill” this week
This week’s “Fiscal Cliff Bill” included some key provisions that help support biotech innovations here in Arizona. Continue reading
Moving Up The Ranks
Over the last decade, Arizona’s bioscience sector has made amazing progress in building foundational infrastructure for research and discovery in the life science sector. This next decade of focused collaboration is our opportunity to move up the ranks and along the path from Discovery to Development to Delivery. Continue reading
AZBio Unveils 2013 Public Policy Initiatives
AZBio’s policy initiatives in 2013 focus on the path from Discovery to Development to Delivery of life science innovations that will benefit the people of Arizona today and in the future.Continue reading
New Force in Arizona Lobbying: Willetta Partners
Veterans Haener & Tassinari Joined by New Partner Tom FarleyContinue reading
IRS Issues Final Medical Device Regulations
The Internal Revenue Service today released the final regulations on the Medical Device Tax which will go into effect in January of 2013 unless it is repealed between now and the end of the calendar year.
Industry groups from across the country have been actively working with both the IRS and with Congress to share with them the far reaching impacts that the tax will have on both new innovations and currrent products developed and/or manufactured on shore.
In a report earlier today, Damian Garde of Fierce Biotechg shared: that the agency is adopting very few of the suggested changes to the law’s major provisions.
“The final regulations do not adopt this suggestion.” That’s a phrase you get used to when reading the IRS’s 58-page document on the 2.3% tax. Commenters had asked for exceptions for devices with medical and non-medical uses, more specific definitions of “taxable medical devices” and provisions that would account for a device’s pricing before applying the tax, among other things.
All of these were weighed, debated and ultimately rejected by the IRS, which by and large affirmed its last guidance, something we covered in detail last month. In sum, that leaves a 2.3% tax on medical devices as defined by the FDA, with exemptions for devices that are sold directly to consumers, destined for further manufacture or slated to be sold outside the U.S. (Source: IRS pays little mind to industry feedback in final device tax regs – FierceMedicalDevices )
The new IRS regulations cover 58 pages. To download a copy, please click here: Medical Device Tax Final Rules 2012-29628_PI
ASBM Paper on Biosimilar Naming Published in the Food and Drug Law Institute’s Policy Forum
Unique names key factor to ensure patient-safety in biosimilar pathwayContinue reading